s c r e a m . o r g
people & places of interest:
https://davidicke.com/ | https://www.ickonic.com/
| ttps://projectavalon.net/forum4/index.php
| https://www.infowars.com/ |
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/ | https://vaccineimpact.com/
| https://home.solari.com/
Covinfo
Data Dump:- SOURCED SEPT 4, 2021: https://archive.is/2021.08.21-120028/https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/p8ov38/acceptable_reasons_for_vaccine_hesitance_w_50/ The current Covid19 vaccines have several problems. I would say that there are 9 main areas of interest:
Below
is a brief overview of each issue with scientific data below for support
(except for 9. which is more a discussion
based on a logical assessment of future risk).
1.
The spike protein of the virus, that is also being utilized in the vaccines,
is damaging to our cells through 3 mechanisms. The first is that when
the spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor it causes the ACE2 to send
signals to the mitochondria within the cell which destroys the mitochondria,
eventually killing the cell. The second is that when the spike protein
binds to our ACE2 receptors it causes the ACE2 to send signals to other
cells which increases the amount of pro-inflammatory agents in the blood.
This inflammation damages the tissues. The third way is that when the
spike protein binds to the ACE2 of the platelets in our blood, it causes
them to clot. Now, the vaccine manufacturers did take steps to make the
spike protein more safe. The spike protein has two parts an S1 subunit
and an S2 subunit. The S1 is the part that connects to the ACE2, and the
S2 is the part that opens up like a knife stabbing the membrane and facilitates
fusion between the membrane of the cell and the envelope of the virus.
With the vaccines, they modified the S2 subnit so that it could not open
up and jab into the cell membranes if it connects with any ACE2 receptors.
They thought this would make the spike protein safe, but this assumption
is false and if they had taken the time to do more research before rushing
to production they would have found that out. It may seem like the jabby
bit is what damages the cells, but actually the major damage is caused
by the S1 connecting to the ACE2 receptor. Just the S1, by itself without
the S2, causes the ACE2 receptor to start the cell signaling processes
that cause the mitochondrial damage, the pro-inflammatory response, and
the blood clots.
Studies
on the spike protein:-
How
the virus uses the spike protein to enter human cells: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02039-y
Article
on how the Covid19 spike protein crosses the blood-brain barrier: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096999612030406X?via%3Dihub
Japanese
article on how the Pfizer vax is associated with brain hemorrhaging (lending
credence to the hypothesis that the spike proteins are crossing the blood
brain barrier in some people): https://joppp.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40545-021-00326-7
Article
on how AstraZeneca is associated with blood clots in the brain (lending
more credence to the hypothesis that the spike proteins are crossing the
blood brain barrier in some people): https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104840
Article
on how the Covid19 spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor of our platelets
to cause bloodclots: https://jhoonline.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13045-020-00954-7
Article
explaining that blood clots from the spike protein interacting with our
platelets are associated with both COVID-19 infection and vaccination:
https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1003648
Article
explains that just the S1 subunit of the spike protein can cause platelets
to clot: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.05.21252960v1
Article
with evidence that spike proteins do end up circulating in the blood,
when they're not supposed to, they're supposed to be anchored on the cell
membranes: https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab465/6279075
More
evidence that spike proteins do not stay on the cell membranes but end
up circulating in the blood. This study aims to explain the blood clots
caused by the J&J and AstraZeneca adenovector vaccines, they claim
that the DNA isn't properly spliced and the spike proteins end up in the
blood causing thrombosis when the spikes attach to the ACE2 receptors
of the endothelial cells: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-558954/v1
Article
on how the spike protein can cause neurodegeneration: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X2100499X?via%3Dihub
Journal
article with evidence that the spike protein by itself can damage cells
by binding to ACE2, causing the cells mitochondria to lose their shape
and break apart: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318902
Article
on how the spike protein in vaccines can cause cell damage via cell signaling:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7827936/
Article
that when the spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor it causes the release
of soluble IL-6R which acts as a extracellular signal which causes inflammation
(see the first paper for evidence that the spike causes the release of
IL-6R and see the second paper for an explanation of how soluble IL-6R
causes pro-inflamatory extracellular signaling: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33284859/
And https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3491447/
Another
article that Spike protein from covid or the vaccine causes inflammation
through cell signaling, this time there is evidence that the spike protein
causes senescence (premature aging) signals in the cell which attracts
leukocytes that cause inflammation of the cell: https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/JVI.00794-21
Spike
protein by itself causes cell damage by eliciting a pro-inflammatory response:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-021-01332-z
Biodistribution
data:-
Pfizer
animal testing document that was obtained by Dr. Byram Bridle through
a FOI request to the Japanese government which shows the biodistribution
of the lipid-nano particles throughout the bodies and organs of the test
subjects. This is evidence that the lipid nanoparticles do not stay in
the injecton site, but instead travel all throughout the body (go to pg
16/23 for the charts showing biodistribution over the course of 48hrs):
https://files.catbox.moe/0vwcmj.pdf
Addendum
to the above link. This blog post provides easy to understand information
(with pictures) on the make-up of the lipid nanoparticles used in the
Covid19 vaccines. It shows that the pharmaceutical companies could have
designed them to have targeting ligands on the outside, so that the nanoparticles
would only transfect the muscle cells. But instead the vax was designed
with PEG polymers on the outside, so that the immune system will not be
able to pick them up and put them in the trash. The PEG is what Byram
Bridle says is the reason the vaccine travels throughout the body and
since it does not have targeting ligands, it can transfect any type of
cell: https://www.cas.org/resource/blog/understanding-nanotechnology-covid-19-vaccines
2.
Vaccine enhanced immune escape occurs when a poorly designed or weak vaccine
helps create new variants. This happens in the exact same way as antibiotic
resistance and regular old evolution. In the case of evolution, if you
want to make an organism stronger, you put it under evolutionarily unfavorable
conditions. This way you kill all the weak examples of the organism and
just leave the strong ones. If you want to create heat resistant bacteria,
put a petri dish full of the bacteria under moderately high heat that
kills 99% of the bacteria. Save the 1% that were able to survive the heat,
allow them to grow, and repeat the process over and over again while turning
up the heat just a little each time. Do this until you have a population
of bacteria that are all extremely heat resistant. The same process occurs
with antibiotic resistance. When you only take half your meds, you kill
99% of the bacteria and you leave only the 1% that were slightly more
resistant to the drugs and now they flourish. Before they were a small
part of the population but you changed the conditions of their environment
so that they have the advantage. You've killed all the normal bacteria
that the mutant variants had to compete with so that now the antibiotic
resistant bacteria are the alpha strain that have unlimited resources
and so surge in population to take over your body. Well, the same thing
happens with viruses and vaccines.
If
you produce a vaccine that elicits a weak immune response, you are creating
an unfavorable environment for the virus. This will kill the weak 99%,
and leave those 1% of mutant virus particles that are not as hindered
by the antibodies produced by the vaccine. Whereas before these mutants
were only a tiny part of the population and would have been unlikely to
transmit on to the next person. Now these mutant virus particles surge
in number because they no longer have to compete with the other virus
particles and your bodies defenses do not work. They are now highly likely
to transmit on to the next person, whereas before they would not have
been able to leave the host in which the mutation occured. In terms of
creating variants, the current covid vaccines are very bad for three reasons.
First, some vaccine manufacturers require two shots and now also boosters
because the first shot produces a very weak immune response. Second, the
vaccines are very leaky. Even after you have gotten a full immune response
from both shots, you can still get and transmit the virus onto others.
Well, which virus particles are likely to get passed on by a fully vaccinated
person? Clearly they will be those virus particles that have the ability
to multiply quickly while avoiding the antibodies produced by the vaccines.
This will create very virulent and antibody resistant variants. Watch
for these variants in the news as time goes on, we're already seeing things
like Delta, Lambda, Eplsion, etc.
As
we implement boosters, they will start to come at faster and faster rates,
and over time data scientists will start to see timed correlations between
the implementation of mass boosters and the emergence of new strains.
Third, the vaccines do seem to help reduce the severity of the disease
when people are infected (although this may change as new variants emerge).
Why would this be a concern? Well, because of the leakiness of the vaccines
we just spoke about. If you have very low symptoms but you can still get
and transmit the virus, then you won't even realize that you're sick and
you'll be spreading the virus to even more people as an asymptomatic carrier.
So, these vaccines will only increase transmission by creating more and
more asymptomatic carriers (although this may not be a bad thing, if everyone
in the world gets the virus and everyone is asymptomatic, then there's
really no need to care about covid anymore. But this is an unrealistic
idealization that is unlikely to occur, some people will still get sick
and die or suffer long haul covid). One additional point to address here
is the claim that the unvaccinated are causing the emergence of new vaccine
resistant variants. Let me be clear, the unvaccinated absolutely have
the ability to facilitate the creation of new variants. However, it would
require a statistically enormous number of people to get the virus before
they could produce a new variant by chance. This is because a mutant virus
particle will only make up a small portion of the virus population inside
a person's body.
Therefore,
it is highly unlikely that this particular particle will be able to spread
to a new person. Whereas, in the vaccinated, their weak immune response
specifically selects for the mutant variants. It is highly likely that
if a vaccinated person passes on the virus to another person, the particles
they pass on will be those that have the ability to escape from the immune
response elicited by the vaccines. An analogy would be if you did an experiment
with 500 room temperature petri dishes filled with bacteria and 500 heated
petri dishes with bacteria, then found a heat resistant variant but didn't
know which dish it came from. It would be absurd to think that the heat
resistant strain of bacteria came from the room temperature petri dishes.
It would possible, sure, but completely improbable that the heat resistant
strain had suddenly appeared in a room temp petri dish. There would be
no reason for it to become a dominant strain in that environment. Logically,
statistically, and evolutionarily, it must have come from the heated petri
dishes. This is a very basic and obvious conclusion, but the media and
government bureaucrats in lab coats are trying to tell you that the absurd
thing is true. They're trying to say that the unvaccinated (the room temperature
petri dishes) are where the vaccine resistant strains are coming from.
Vaccine
Enhanced Immune Escape:-
Evidence
of cov2 immune escape: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2021/06/30/science.abi7994
Article
from 2015 that explains how imperfect vaccination (like the Pfizer and
moderna that require at least two shots to be effective) can create immune
escape variants: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002198
Article
from 2021 explains that unless vaccination is done quickly, there will
be a high probability of escape mutants: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-95025-3
3.
There is a potential for ADE, antibody dependent enhancement. This is
when the virus mutates so that the antibodies no longer neutralize the
virus but the antibodies still try to attach to it. This can actually
help the virus get into your immune cells because when the virus is covered
with antibodies it will draw macrophages to the virus that will try to
eat it. However, when your macrophages come to eat the virus particle
that they think has been neutralized, the virus gets inside them and starts
replicating because the antibodies actually didn't neutralize the virus.
Your own antibodies act like a kind of Trojan Horse. Another way that
ADE can happen is your own antibodies connect to the receptors of your
cells and actually help the virus get in directly. This was a huge problem
with the Dengue vaccine and we need to do a lot of testing to make sure
this isn't a possibility. Clearly with these rushed vaccines we haven't
eliminated this possibility and with the virus mutating, ADE may pop up
with a later variant. We must stay vigilant and keep an eye out for this
signal. It will manifest as people with high antibody levels being more
likely to get sick and die.
Antibody
Dependent Enhancement:-
Journal
article from 2005 shows evidence that sars-cov1 vaccine, that also focused
on the spike protein, caused ADE when subjects were challenged with different
strain: https://www.nature.com/articles/news050110-3#ref-CR1
Article
explaining how ADE works in Sar-cov1: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2538-8
Article
explaining the potential for ADE in Covid19: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2538-8
Another
article that speculates on the potential for ADE in Covid19: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32920233/
Article
from 2021 explains that there is evidence that covid19 is able to kill
macrophages by using antibody dependent mechanisms: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.22.432407v1
4.
There is a potential for an autoimmune response from the vaccines. The
vaccines that were developed for Sars-Cov-1 used the spike protein, just
like the vaccines for Sars-Cov-2. Unfortunately, those vaccines caused
the animals to develop serious autoimmune disorders and they ended up
causing severe organ damage. There is a question about whether these new
vaccines, which also focus on the spike protein, will also cause autoimmune
disorders. The problem is that autoimmune disorders take time to develop
and to show up. It may also take a long time before doctors and scientists
can link the sudden rise in autoimmune disorders with these vaccines.
Usually, in a vaccine trial you closely monitor your trial group for years
and years. This allows you to identify the signals. With the current program
of injecting millions of people, there will be no clear way to link causation
to the vaccines and an increase in autoimmune disorders may just fly under
the radar. We may not know for a very long time or never. Another concern
is that because of the way the mRNA vaccines work, they cause your own
cells to present as foreign entities. Your immune system comes over and
starts killing your own cells. This has never been done before in human
history. We have no idea if there will be long term consequences for this
and whether this will lead to autoimmune disorders.
Research
results of past vaccines for sars-cov1 that used the spike protein:-
Journal
article from 2004 on autoimmune disorders from Sars-cov1 vaccine that
also focused on the spike protein: https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2004/12/sars-vaccine-linked-liver-damage-ferret-study
Journal
article from 2005 on autoimmune disorders from Sars-cov1 vaccine that
also focused on the spike protein: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15755610/
Journal
article from 2012 on autoimmune disorders from Sars-cov1 vaccine that
also focused on the spike protein: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0035421
Journal
article from 2020 on autoimmune disorders from Sars-cov vaccine (can't
figure out if they're talking about cov1 or 2): https://jvi.asm.org/content/78/22/12672.abstract
Journal
article from 2020 explains why immune disorders happen with covid vax,
because human and Covid19 proteins are similar: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589909020300186
5.
The mRNA vaccines are narrowly focused on just the spike protein when
they could have been designed to target more proteins. The Covid19 coronavirus
has 4 main proteins. There are 3 on its outside and 1 on the inside. The
S-protein, the M-protein, and the E-protein, are on the outside, while
the N-protein is on the inside. When you get a natural infection your
body will likely produce antibodies for all or most of these proteins
(depending on the function of your own unique immune system). We knew
from studying Sars-Cov-1 that antibodies to the S-protein and the M-protein
are both neutralizing. In fact, they used exactly that knowledge when
they designed the current vaccines. So, they could have tried to make
vaccines that utilize the M-protein to avoid the potential for autoimmune
disorders discussed above. But they didn't, they instead focused only
on the S-protein. They could have designed the vaccines so that they present
both the S-protein and the M-protein. This would have made the vaccines
much more effective and less leaky since any mutated virus particles would
have to have mutated both the S-protein and the M-protein to avoid the
antibodies. Whereas, the current vaccines are narrowly focused on just
the S-protein, meaning that the virus only has to mutate the one protein.
It is exponentially harder for an organism to mutate two beneficial traits
vs just mutating one beneficial trait. So, these vaccines are worse than
they could have been.
Vaccine
efficacy:-
Article
explains how vaccine manufacturers have used relative risk reduction to
determine that vaccine efficacy is ~90+%, however they should have used
absolute risk reduction which would tell us that the vaccines will only
reduce total covid cases by ~1%: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(21)00069-0/fulltext
Addendum
to the above information. This video from 2013 explains the difference
between relative and absolute risk reduction in a very simple way: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7K30MGvOs5s&ab_channel=TerryShaneyfelt
Article
from 2005 explains that antibodies to the S-protein and the M-protein
are effective in neutralizing the sars-cov1 virus. However, the sars-cov2
vaccines only target the S-protein. This is evidence that the vaccine
manufacturers could have chosen to make a superior mrna vax that produced
two types of antibodies, but chose to focus narrowly on just the S-protein:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16544518/
Antibodies
from vaccines start to drop within 6 months, get ready for endless boosters:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03777-9
6.
There are alternative treatments that are effective against Covid19 but
they are being suppressed. Why? Because the vaccines are not approved
by the FDA but instead they are emergency use authorized only. The emergency
use authorization can only be granted if "there are no adequate, approved,
and available alternatives". Well, a growing body of scientific research
is showing that both Ivermectin and Fluvoxamine (among other drugs) are
adequate alternatives for early treatment of Covid19, and both of these
drugs have been FDA approved for years. Unfortunately, that means they
are now off patent and no one can make any money off of them. So, for
the vaccines to continue to receive their EUA, the existence of these
treatments must be suppressed. We have seen a huge amount of censorship
of doctors who have been speaking out about these drugs.
Ivermectin:-
Emergency
use authorization for the vaccines cannot be granted if there are effective
alternative approved treatments for Covid19. So, if the pharmaceutical
industry is going to make any money off covid, they must suppress the
existence of any existing off patent drugs that may be effective in treating
or preventing covid: https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization
Meta-analysis
on the efficacy of Ivermectin in treating Covid19: https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/Abstract/9000/Ivermectin_for_Prevention_and_Treatment_of.98040.aspx
A
double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial shows that Ivermectin
is able to cure covid within 6 days for most people: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.31.21258081v1
More
evidence that Ivermectin treatment leads to much faster recovery from
Covid19: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmv.26880
An
NIH study reveals that a five-day course of ivermectin for the treatment
of COVID-19 may reduce the duration of illness: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33278625/
Ivermectin
stops replication of covid: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220302011
Ivermectin
has anti-viral properties: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888155/
Ivermectin
has anti-viral properties against covid: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41429-020-0336-
Ivermectin
binds to Covid19 proteins to block the virus: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7996102/
Evidence
that Ivermectin can be effective as a prophylaxis, Argentinian frontline
healthcare workers were given Ivermectin as a preventative and zero got
sick with covid, whereas 58.2% of the control group who did not take Ivermectin
got covid: https://www.buongiornosuedtirol.it/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Nota-Journal-of-Biomedical-Research-Safety-and-Efficacy-Iota-Carrageenan-and-Ivermectin.pdf
Ivermectin
safe to give 12mg per day for 5 days: https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712%2820%2932506-6/fulltext
Ivermectin
safely administered 60mg per day for 6 months: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10428194.2020.1786559
Fluvoxamine:-
Fluvoxamine
helps in covid treatment: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33180097/
Covid
leads to long term inflammation, useful for long haul Covid19 treatment:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33391730/
Fluvoxamine
has anti-inflammatory properties that can help treat covid: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.652688/full
7.
We've known for decades that once you are infected with a virus or disease,
your body creates a robust immune response, including memory T cells and
B cells. These cells stick around so that you can quickly respond to a
new infection. However, this fact is being completely ignored by vaccine
pushers, they want a needle in every arm, even in the arms of those who
do not need it, like the covid recovered. We might say, well covid is
new and different, and perhaps immunity wanes after a time. This assumption
was prudent in the beginning of the pandemic but now we have lots of evidence
that the covid recovered have a near zero chance of getting sick again.
Your body takes a few weeks and months to build up its antibodies after
an infection. Most of the time the second infection takes place during
this time frame. There is no reason to force every covid recovered patient
to take an experimental drug, especially after that initial 3 month period
after they have build up a sufficient immune response. If you still think
that the miniscule chance that their immune system has failed makes them
a danger, then why are these people not asked for proof of antibodies.
It's because they don't actually care if you have antibodies. The vaccinated,
without knowing whether they have antibodies or not, can walk around free,
but a covid recovered patient, with proof of antibodies is still considered
a danger. It's ass backwards and it is evidence that vax pushers don't
actually care about immunity. It is just about getting a needle into every
arm. The reason why they are
doing this, I do not know I leave it up to you, but it doesn't make sense and I make a point of not going along with things that don't make sense. Studies
on covid recovered:-
No
benefit from vaccination of previously infected individuals: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.01.21258176v2
Covid19
infection produces long lasting immunity: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03647-4
Second
article that covid19 infection produces life long immunity: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01442-9
More
evidence that covid19 infection produces long term immunity: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.19.21255739v1
Study
of 600,000 covid recovered patients finds less than 1% reinfection rate
over 10 months and an almost 0% risk in the first 7 months: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8209951/pdf/RMV-9999-e2260.pdf
8.
There is a growing amount of data that people are having severe reactions
to the vaccines. It gets little to no coverage in the press, in some cases
people who talk about their reactions on social media are being censored
and called anti-vaxxers (I mean, how asinine to call someone who took
the jab an anti-vaxxer) or fakers (I am sure some are faking for money/attention,
but I highly doubt it's many of them given the social consequences for
lying). Some senators have done press conferences with these people so
they can tell their stories. There are publicly accessible government
databases which contain reports of people who have had adverse reactions
to the vaccines. These systems were put in place in the 90's to act as
a sort of early warning system and to give transparency to the public
after previous botched vaccine rollouts like the 1976 swine flu vaccine
debacle. You can go and read these reports for yourself. There are websites
that download the reports and present them to the public in a very readable
manner (the government website from the 90's is not very good). There
are concerns that these reports are being made in error or by bad actors.
However, research has been done into these systems and it was found that
more than 80% of the adverse reactions had seemingly no other cause or
explaination aside from the vaccine. In the past, if a vaccine hit 50
deaths or a few hundred adverse reactions on these reporting systems,
they would shutdown the vaccination program. As of writing this, for the
covid vaccines the deaths are into the thousands and the serious adverse
reactions are into the hundreds of thousands. Yet they just keep rolling
with the shots and now are even forcibly manadating the shot.
VAERS:-
Analysis
on the VAERS death data shows that in 86% of reports the vaccine cannot
be ruled out as a causal factor in the death of the patient: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352837543_Analysis_of_COVID-19_vaccine_death_reports_from_the_Vaccine_Adverse_Events_Reporting_System_VAERS_Database_Interim_Results_and_Analysis
Addendum
to the above link. OpenVAERS is a site that allows you to easily read
VAERS reports and breaks down the numbers. The reports seem to be a lot
of people who have comorbidities or are old, but there are also some really
eye opening cases where young people experience horrible side effects.
Read for yourself and make up your own mind about what the vax is doing
to your fellow Americans: https://www.openvaers.com/openvaers
9.
Criminals are innocent until proven guilty, but medical drugs are not
like criminals, medical drugs are guilty until proven innocent. Pharmaceutical
companies must prove the innocence of their medications through long term
testing. Doctors, bureaucrats, and the public seem to have forgotten this
fact when they mandate a new technology to be injected into us without
long term testing to prove the innocence of the drug. The vaccine may
have completely unknown and serious side effects that manifest in a majority
of the people only in the long term. So, the vax may appear to be safe
in the short term, but in the long run it causes severe harm or even death.
It is extremely risky to innoculate the entire population if we don't
know what the long term effects may be. It is especially risky to vax
our critical workers with an experimental drug about which we know nothing
in the long term. If it turns out that within 2 years of taking it, the
vaccine causes the debilitation of a large portion of the people who took
it and we had forced all our healthcare professionals to take it, then
our countries will lose a large portion of their healthcare professionals.
This would devastate our society's ability to treat the sick and cause
massive death and suffering. Same goes for the military. If we vax all
our fighters, and the vax turns out to greatly physically or mentally
weaken most of the people who took it, there goes our ability to defend
ourselves. We won't be able to fight off any aggressors and will lose
years of military experience as we will have to re-train a whole new set
of recruits without the previous military leaders. If most of the laborers
are vaxxed and the vax causes bodily weakness, then they won't be able
to go to work and our production falls to zero. Without domestic production,
we would have to rely on foreign imports but the economy would also grind
to a halt so the nation would have no money to pay for these imports.
This would probably be a death stroke for whatever nation was victim to
it. So, force vaccinating critical workers, or even a large portion of
the menial labor force, is a massive national security risk. We also have
no way of calculating how large the percentage of risk is since we know
nothing at all about the long term effects of innoculation with this type
of technology. This could utterly destroy any highly vaxxed nations. This
outcome would be so bad (total collapse of a society's infrastructure)
that only a massive amount of safety data could justify innoculating the
entire population with any treatment. But we just don't have that safety
data for these experimental drugs right now, and will probably not have
it for decades to come. By then, it will be too late to do anything about
it. You can fry an egg, but you can't unfry it. Just the same, you won't
be able to unvax the population, there's no way to get the vax out of
the body once it's in. The solution is to only vax the old and vulnerable
at risk populations and not vax everyone. This issue worries me deeply
since there must be risk responsive people at high levels of government
who must understand and be sensitive to this type of national security
risk. Yet, these people are either being completely ignored or they are
allowing the government to proceed with the risky mass vaccination programs
anyway.
Separately,
these 9 issues would be a concern. But put together, they are incredibly
alarming. To me, something feels very wrong here. You too may have already
felt it in your gut or in the back of your mind or when reading this.
That feeling that something is wrong is instinct, it is the product of
millions of years of evolution. A gift from our ancestors who also saw
something that was wrong in their environment and had this weird bad feeling.
They acted on it and it saved them. So they were able to pass on that
instinct to their off-spring from generation to generation. Now, after
millions of years, it finds its way to you. If you feel what I feel, that
something is very wrong here, I implore you:
|
Antibiotic-Resistant
Pathogens and Mask Exhaustion Syndrome
The featured study looked only at the raw numbers from Kansas and did not delve
into what may have been behind the increasing severity of disease and death
in the people who wore masks. For example, when researchers from the University
of Antwerp, Belgium, analyzed the microbial community on surgical and cotton
face masks from 13 healthy volunteers after being worn for four hours, bacteria
including Bacillus, Staphylococcus and Acinetobacter were found — 43% of which
were antibiotic-resistant. Researchers from Germany similarly questioned whether
a mask that covers your nose and mouth is “free from undesirable side effects”
and potential hazards in everyday use. It turned out they were not and instead
posed significant adverse effects and pathophysiological changes, including
the following, which often occur in combination.
References" The Daily
Skeptic, May 2, 2022 Cureus, 2022;14(4) PLOS|One, 2021, doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252315
medRxiv, August 7, 2021, doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.18.21257385 Abstract medRxiv,
May 25, 2021; doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.18.21257385 Yahoo News, January 1, 2021
Hull York Medical School, April 6, 2022 Western Standard, April 17, 2022 Journal
of Hazardous Material, 2021;411 BitChute January 1, 2021 1:58 City Journal August
11, 2021 MMWR July 17, 2020 / 69(28);930-932 Frontiers in Medicine, 2021; doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.732047
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021 Apr;
18(8): 4344 ABC News10, November 8, 2021 New York Post, November 3, 2021 Flgov.com,
Ron Desantis July 30, 2021 The Daily Wire, November 14, 2021 The Daily Wire,
November 14, 2021, para 6 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, June 2,
2022 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, June 6, 2022, Table 1 Total
tab Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, January 25, 2022 medRxiv,
August 7, 2021, doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.18.21257385 Medicine, 2022;101(7) 42
43 References"
DISPELLING
THE MYTH of “A PANDEMIC OF THE UNVACCINATED”
If ICU capacity were really a concern … • Why hasn't the government been able
to increase ICU capacity during this time? • Why did they not re-direct the
millions received for vaccine passports toward increasing capacity and relief
for weary health care workers? • Why did they lay off 10,000 unvaccinated workers
who had served faithfully over the course of the pandemic?
Uncoupling of deaths from hospitalizations occurred prior to the achievement
of therapeutic vaccination rates meaning it is unlikely that it is due to mass
vaccination
MORE HOSPITALIZATIONS IN VACCINATED Dispelling the myth of the pandemic of the
unvaccinated 27 Ontario COVID-19 Hospital and ICU Admissions by Vaccination
Status from August 8, 2021 to January 20, 202
Snakes & Covid: https://vokalnow.com/video/4846
NASA used religious experts to predict how humans may react to aliens
https://thehill.com/changing-america/enrichment/arts-culture/587480-nasa-hired-religious-experts-to-predict-how-humans/
Why would they do that? "Detection [of alien life] might come in a decade "
.... that was in 2017. SO my guess is in 5 years! Woa!
INVESTIGATIVE
REPORTS
Schwab Family Values Is the real Klaus Schwab a kindly old uncle figure wishing to do good for humanity, or is he really the son of a Nazi collaborator who used slave labour and aided Nazi efforts to obtain the first atomic bomb? Johnny Vedmore investigates. https://unlimitedhangout.com/2021/02/investigative-reports/schwab-family-values/ |
![]() |